Who is overseeing the maintence? Measuring the results?

Please read the FAQ regarding our Due Diligence process and you'll see that we only choose projects with rigorous accountability, high survival rates (as much as can be achieved through good practice - given severe climate instability in all areas - all have replanting processes in place) and ongoing monitoring and reporting (high UK charitable standards of protection of UK tax payers money to international beneficiaries) The processes vary between projects and forest type - some are more rudimentary (for mangrove forests which thrive and reseed extremely fast) and some more complex (agro-forestry in India requiring drip irrigation to ensure survival).

Again, this is part of the training that the communities go through with the organisations supporting them to do their own protection, replanting where needed, and monitoring - and depending upon each project (they all differ) members of the organisations visit to audit, and there are also external parties who periodically evaluate and help to improve processes. We are due to receive yearly reports from each organisation that we will then share on the respective tree project pages of the web site . We're newly in relationship with Eden, WeForest and ITF so have yet to get our first reports from them.